A virtues approach to personality

By Michael Cawley, James E. Martin, John A. Johnson. 2000

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adb784ded9f7290576b34204e29b4ff1e3481af2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths (2015, background): “As Peterson and Seligman (2004) also noted, the VIA Classification was based on a much broader review than the lexical approach followed by Cawley et al. (2000).”
Individual Differences in Religion and Spirituality: An Issue of Personality Traits and/or Values (2008, unknown): “In fact, it is the character- and virtues-related (see Cawley, Martin, and Johnson 2000) personality factors of A and C that have clear and systematic links with religiousness and it is O that distinguishes between open- versus closed-minded religious dimensions such as spirituality versus…”
Strengths Coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology (2006, background): “This exclusion of character from definitions of personality was decisive (Nicholson, 1998), and had the effect of excluding a psychology of strengths from the personality lexicon because ‘strengths’ were considered value-laden – and hence part of character, which was of concern to ethicists and phil”
Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of Strengths (2007, unknown): “However, this exclusion has recently been questioned, with new evidence indicating that virtue is a function of personality rather than moral reasoning and cognitive development ( Cawley, Martin, & Johnson, 2000 ).”
The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths (2010, methodology): “Nevertheless, some virtues research supports a four-dimensional solution (Cawley et al., 2000; Dahlsgaard, 2005; Park & Peterson, 2006), and Component IV is somewhat similar in content to Cawley et al.”
Toward a Multicultural Positive Psychology: (2003, background): “A virtue-oriented approach in psychology can provide a helpful complement to the more cognitive and individualistic Kohlbergian approach that has dominated moral development in the past (Cawley et al., 2000).”
STRENGTHS OF CHARACTER AND WELL-BEING (2004, background): “Lexical approaches to personality began with the 18,000 trait terms in the English language identified by Allport and Odbert (1936), who deliberately excluded “moral” trait terms from their original list, which means that they have never been incorporated into Big Five measures (cf. Cawley, Martin,”
Conceptualization and Measurement of Virtuous Leadership: Doing Well by Doing Good (2016, methodology): “Using a “formative approach” (cf. Sendjaya et al., 2008) in which the virtues were derived empirically rather than purely from theory, factor analysis of these items revealed four virtues: empathy, order, resourcefulness, and serenity (cf. Cawley et al., 2000).”
Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future (2006, background): “Equally, that the study of human strengths and virtues is a topic that should be central to a psychology of the human condition, rather than one that is ‘‘defined out’’ of psychological study, as Allport (1937) did, in his seminal definition of what constituted the psychological study of personality”