Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions

By Ilias O. Pappas, Panos E. Kourouthanassis, Michail N. Giannakos, V. Chrissikopoulos. 2016

473 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The role of emotions and conflicting online reviews on consumers' purchase intentions (2018, methodology): “The use of fsQCA addresses the inadequacy of regression-based techniques for dealing with the complex causality surrounding consumers’ online behavior (Pappas et al., 2016), and thus it is most appropriate for analyzing the study’s research propositions (Ragin, 2008).”
Antecedents of Space Traveler Behavioral Intention (2020, methodology): “Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is conducted to check the scale composition of the items (Pappas et al. 2016).”
Mobile shopping cart abandonment: The roles of conflicts, ambivalence, and hesitation (2018, unknown): “Second, using the CAB framework, this research echoes Pappas et al.’s (2016) finding that the causes of online shopping are complex and usually involve both cognitive and emotional components.”
Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness (2016, methodology): “…the first studies to examine the configural analysis based on individual-level data and according to scholars (Leischnig & Kasper-Brauer, 2015; Pappas et al., 2015), the application of complexity theory in individual level phenomenamay be proven suitable for theory building (Pappas et al., 2015).”