Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets
By Andrea M. Philipp, Miriam Gade, Iring Koch. 2007
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad99bea7930593f229d76745e18db95f2a4e5fd5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- David W. Green
- Jubin Abutalebi
- Susan C. Bobb
- Z. Wodniecka
- John W. Schwieter
- Jared Linck
- Gretchen L. Sunderman
- Ellen Bialystok
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- David W. Green
- Jubin Abutalebi
- Susan C. Bobb
- Z. Wodniecka
- John W. Schwieter
- Jared Linck
- Gretchen L. Sunderman
- Ellen Bialystok
Citations in the corpus
- Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning (2013, background): “If, as claimed by Philipp et al. (2007), the costs (in both language and non-linguistic task switching) are related to the persistence of activation rather than an inhibitory mechanism, then it could be argued that bilinguals are better at resisting this persistence of activation when switching…”
- Inhibitory control predicts language switching performance in trilingual speech production* (2011, background): “…into a less dominant L2 or L3, switch costs should be greater when switching from the dominant L1 than when switching between the less dominant languages – a prediction specific to the trilingual case that has implications for any theory of language switching (see also Philipp et al., 2007).”
- Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies (2008, background): “The pattern of asymmetry observed between L1 and L2 is also observed between L1 and L3 and L2 and L3 (Philipp et al., 2007).”