The Sociotropy–Autonomy Scale: Structure and Implications

By P. Bieling, A. Beck, Gregory K Brown. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2000

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad67b476c24446c04fc0ff49bd4a33a5b998c886

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jochen Peter
2. Patti M. Valkenburg
3. Catherine A Cottrell
4. Mark R. Leary
5. Richard T. Liu
6. L. Alloy
7. Kristine M. Kelly
8. Lisa S. Schreindorfer

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Patti M. Valkenburg
2. Jochen Peter
3. Mark R. Leary
4. Richard T. Liu
5. L. Alloy
6. K. Neff
7. E. Watkins
8. F. Sirois

Citations in the corpus

• Construct Validity of the Need to Belong Scale: Mapping the Nomological Network (2013, background): “Rather, they assess the degree to which people desire to be liked (the highest loading item is “It is important to me to be liked and approved by others”; Bieling et al., 2000), feelings of unease when one is uncertain of others’ positive regard (e.”
• Research Note: Individual Differences in Perceptions of Internet Communication (2006, methodology): “Need for affiliation We used four items from the preference for affiliation subscale of the Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale developed by Bieling et al. (2000).”
• Sexual Dysfunctional Beliefs Questionnaire: An instrument to assess sexual dysfunctional beliefs as vulnerability factors to sexual problems (2003, background): “A recent factor analysis (Bieling et al., 2000) suggests a by-dimensional structure for each scale: fear of criticism and rejection and preference for affiliation in the Sociotropy Scale; independent goal attainment and sensitivity to other’s control in the Autonomy Scale.”
• Stress generation in depression: A systematic review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future study (2010, background): “…of the SAS and the development of two-factor solutions for both sociotropy and autonomy that demonstrate stronger associations with psychopathology (Bieling et al., 2000), another possible explanation for the conflicting findings may be found in the reliance on composite sociotropy and autonomy…”