Tenure Choice and Labour Market Outcomes

By N. Coulson, Lynn M. Fisher, Andrew J. Oswald. 2002

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad5bdde3c1fd2ba81b9b668d8c54955503ce871b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Lynn M. Fisher
2. N. Coulson
3. Andrew J. Oswald
4. David G. Blanchflower
5. M. Rosholm
6. J. Munch
7. Michael Svarer
8. A. H. Y. Ma

In Finance

1. Lynn M. Fisher
2. N. Coulson
3. M. Rosholm
4. J. Munch
5. Michael Svarer
6. A. H. Y. Ma
7. E. Phimister
8. H. Battu

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lynn M. Fisher
2. N. Coulson
3. M. Rosholm
4. J. Munch
5. Michael Svarer
6. Andrew J. Oswald
7. R. Ronald
8. Rowan Arundel

Citations in the corpus

• What are the social benefits of homeownership? Experimental evidence for low-income households (2010, unknown): “Coulson and Fisher (2009) used the state marginal tax rate and the percentage of households in the MSA in multifamily housing as instruments for homeownership. Van Leuvensteijn and Koning (2004) used the regional homeownership rate as an instrument. Similarly, Munch et al. (2006) used the labor-mark”
• The false promise of homeownership: Homeowner societies in an era of declining access and rising inequality (2020, background): “Beyond income, precarious employment often denies access to mortgage credit or deters purchase decisions (Coulson and Fisher 2002).”
• Are Home Owners Really More Unemployed? (2006, unknown): “Coulson and Fischer (2002) test the hypothesis on PSID data from the US that owners have poorer labour market outcomes than do renters.”
• Low-income Homeownership: American Dream or Delusion? (2006, background): “Coulson and Fisher (2002) address the relationship between homeownership and mobility directly by examining the impact of homeownership on labour market outcomes.”
• Housing, Mobility and Unemployment (2005, unknown): “22 Coulson and Fisher (2002) find, for example, that homeowners typically earn significantly higher wages than renters do and are more mobile. Green and Hendershott (2001) point out that selection issues are important. For example, those who expect to have more stable employment (and thus can amorti”
• Does High Home-Ownership Impair the Labor Market? (2013, background): “A modern literature includes Battu, Ma, and Phimister (2008), Coulson and Fisher (2002, 2009), Dohmen (2005), Head and Lloyd-Ellis (2012), Van Leuvensteijn and Koning (2004), Munch, Rosholm, and Svarer (2006), Rouwendal and Nijkamp (2010), Smith and Zenou (2003), and Zabel (2012).”
• Housing tenure and labor market impacts: The search goes on (2008, methodology): “Using Australian data, Flatau et al (2003) extend the empirical scope of Coulson and Fisher (2002).”
• HOUSING TENURE, JOB MOBILITY AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UK* (2008, background): “As such these results are in line with most of the micro-econometric studies for the US (Goss and Phillips, 1997; Coulson and Fisher, 2002) and Australia (Flatau et al., 2003).”
• Home Ownership, Job Duration and Wages (2006, methodology): “According to the survey by Dietz and Haurin [6] not much research exists on this relationship, but Coulson and Fisher [3] is an exception.”