Does High Home-Ownership Impair the Labor Market?

By David G. Blanchflower, Andrew J. Oswald. Social Science Research Network, 2013

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We explore the hypothesis that high home-ownership damages the labor market. Our results are relevant to, and may be worrying for, a range of policymakers and researchers. We fi nd that rises in the home-ownership rate in a US state are a precursor to eventual sharp rises in unemployment in that state. Th e elasticity exceeds unity: A doubling of the rate of home-ownership in a US state is followed in the long-run by more than a doubling of the later unemployment rate. What mechanism might explain this? We show that rises in home-ownership lead to three problems: (i) lower levels of labor mobility, (ii) greater commuting times, and (iii) fewer new businesses. Our argument is not that owners themselves are disproportionately unemployed. Th e evidence suggests, instead, that the housing market can produce negative ‘externalities’ upon the labor market. Th e time lags are long. Th at gradualness may explain why these important patterns are so little-known.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e00bbf4d96d3ed6560795dce90141e4bb41e948f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Panagiotis Printzis
  2. Theodore Panagiotidis

In Finance

  1. Panagiotis Printzis
  2. Theodore Panagiotidis

Citations in the corpus