Chemical Defenses of Freshwater Macrophytes Against Crayfish Herbivory
By R. Bolser, Mark E. Hay, N. Lindquist, W. Fenical, D. Wilson. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2004
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biotechnology, Insect Science, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad1ee3144d5e22d9f8ae57e50dd916d127d47c70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biotechnology
In Insect Science
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish (2007, background): “NICS usually avoid plants, which are chemically defended by multiple compounds, notwithstanding their high concentrations of protein, nitrogen, and dry mass (Bolser et al. 1998).”
- Invasive crayfish in Europe: the impact of Procambarus clarkii on the littoral community of a Mediterranean lake (2007, unknown): “while avoiding plants that contain defensive chemical (Bolser et al., 1998).”
- CRAYFISH FEEDING PREFERENCES FOR FRESHWATER MACROPHYTES: THE INFLUENCE OF PLANT STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY (2002, background): “…including P. clarkii, base their feeding decisions on multiple plant traits such as morphology, structure, chemical defenses, and nutritive value (Mattson, 1980; Lodge, 1991; Newman, 1991; Doucet and Fryxell, 1993; Bolser et al., 1998; Cronin, 1998; Kreider and Watts, 1998; Lodge et al., 1998).”
- Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii (2006, background): “On the contrary, crayfish had no effect on U. australis, possibly because this plant contains some chemicals that make it unpalatable to the crayfish (e.g. Bolser et al. 1998; Nyström 1999).”