Consumption and Income Inequality in Australia
By G. Barrett, Thomas F Crossley, Christopher Worswick. 2000
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ace8cc26dfe60bc222bca22a9506d8ee98f5d12c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Money Does not Buy Happiness: Or Does It? A Reassessment Based on the Combined Effects of Wealth, Income and Consumption (2008, unknown): “It has been suggested that the finding that consumption inequality generally seems to be lower than income inequality lends indirect support to this hypothesis (Barrett et al. 2000; Cutler and Katz 1992; Slesnick 1998).”
- Social Disadvantage, Tenure and Location: An Analysis of Sydney and Melbourne (2005, background): “Secondly, there is increasing evidence of an associated income polarisation between the rich and poor, and particularly a growing income disadvantage of the working poor in recent years, despite general economic prosperity (Barrett et al., 2000; Saunders, 2003).”
- Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in Urban China, 1986-2000 (2005, background): “(Y F j /Y T i ) ∗ = α0 + β log(Y T i /Y F j ) ∗ (3)”