Social Disadvantage, Tenure and Location: An Analysis of Sydney and Melbourne

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Suburbanizing Disadvantage in Australian Cities: Sociospatial Change in an Era of Neoliberalism (2014, methodology): “This analysis adapts and extends the approach used by Randolph and Holloway (2005) in Sydney and Melbourne to identify the locations of areas of greatest social disadvantage, but in this case taking the starting point back to 1986 and forward to 2006 and extending the method to include an estimate…”
Delivering the Compact City in Australia: Current Trends and Future Implications (2006, background): “This issue is already posing problems in some areas, particularly where the stock has passed into lower cost rental and marginal ownership, especially, for example, in the middle suburbs of Sydney (Randolph, 2002; Randolph & Holloway, 2005).”
Shocking the Suburbs: Urban Location, Homeownership and Oil Vulnerability in the Australian City (2008, background): “Housing has been the subject of much of this work (Somerville, 1998) with tenure a central concern, whether in the form of public housing (Taylor, 1998) or owner occupation (Randolph & Holloway, 2005; Winter & Stone, 1998).”