The effect of elasticity on drop creation in T-shaped microchannels

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Correlations of droplet formation in T-junction microfluidic devices: from squeezing to dripping (2008, background): “2004), cross-flow shear in T-junction microchannel (Thorsen et al. 2001; Xu et al. 2006a, b, c; Garstecki et al. 2006; Cristini and Tan 2004; Husny and Cooper-White 2006), and hydrodynamic flow focusing (Anna et al.”
Microdevices for extensional rheometry of low viscosity elastic liquids: a review (2013, methodology): “: 1028 h LE h TYPESET MS Code : h CP h DISK4 4 R E V IS E D PR O O F 508 microfluidic devices (Husny and Cooper-White 2006), the 509 study of elastic driven instabilities (Soulages et al. 2009b), 510 and for use as passive micro-mixers (Hsieh and Huang 2008).”
Effect of geometry on droplet formation in the squeezing regime in a microfluidic T-junction (2010, background): “Although experimental (Thorsen et al. 2001; Garstecki et al. 2006; Tice et al. 2004; Guillot and Colin 2005; Husny and Cooper-White 2006; Christopher et al. 2008) and numerical (Van der Graaf et al.”
Two-phase microfluidic flows (2011, background): “So in T-junction devices, even though a significant difference appears in the initial necking stage due to the presence of elasticity, this contributed little to the final droplet size and droplet productivity (Husny and Cooper-White, 2006).”