Correlations of droplet formation in T-junction microfluidic devices: from squeezing to dripping
By Jianhong Xu, S. W. Li, J. Tan, Guangshen Luo. 2008
381 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f34dce81608b88e8b60e4aa8f56b775947c0c759
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- I. Kobayashi
- M. Nakajima
- Nam-Trung Nguyen
- Anton P. J. Middelberg
- Levent Yobas
- Say Hwa Tan
- Chun‐Xia Zhao
- T. Kang
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Anton P. J. Middelberg
- I. Kobayashi
- Levent Yobas
- Say Hwa Tan
- Chun‐Xia Zhao
- T. Kang
- Nam-Trung Nguyen
- G. Vladisavljević
Citations in the corpus
- Formation and manipulation of ferrofluid droplets at a microfluidic T-junction (2010, background): “The flow rates were chosen to cover the transition from the squeezing to the dripping regime [65–67].”
- Production of uniform droplets using membrane, microchannel and microfluidic emulsification devices (2012, methodology): “The capillary number calculated for the continuous phase, Cac, can be used to predict a dominant mechanism of droplet formation: Cac 0.002 within squeezing regime and 0.01 Cac 0.3 within dripping regime (Xu et al., 2008).”
- Two-phase microfluidic flows (2011, background): “When the two phase flow is within the transient regime between squeezing and dripping, the dynamics of droplet breakup is controlled by both of the mechanisms, and the droplet size can be described by the following scaling law (Xu et al., 2008):”