An empirical study on TensorFlow program bugs

By Yuhao Zhang, Yifan Chen, Shing-Chi Cheung, Yingfei Xiong, Lu Zhang. International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, 2018

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deep learning applications become increasingly popular in important domains such as self-driving systems and facial identity systems. Defective deep learning applications may lead to catastrophic consequences. Although recent research efforts were made on testing and debugging deep learning applications, the characteristics of deep learning defects have never been studied. To fill this gap, we studied deep learning applications built on top of TensorFlow and collected program bugs related to TensorFlow from StackOverflow QA pages and Github projects. We extracted information from QA pages, commit messages, pull request messages, and issue discussions to examine the root causes and symptoms of these bugs. We also studied the strategies deployed by TensorFlow users for bug detection and localization. These findings help researchers and TensorFlow users to gain a better understanding of coding defects in TensorFlow programs and point out a new direction for future research.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aca824950a7f0c58b10c963fe2e16673b00e6f83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mark Harman
  2. Paolo Tonella
  3. Gabriele Bavota
  4. Lei Ma
  5. Yang Liu
  6. Jie M. Zhang
  7. Felix Stahlberg
  8. Graham Neubig

In Signal Processing

  1. Mark Harman
  2. Gabriele Bavota
  3. Lei Ma
  4. Yang Liu
  5. Jie M. Zhang

Citations in the corpus