Taxonomy of Real Faults in Deep Learning Systems

By Nargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Gabriele Bavota, Vincenzo Riccio, Andrea Stocco, Paolo Tonella. 2019

363 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The growing application of deep neural networks in safety-critical domains makes the analysis of faults that occur in such systems of enormous importance. In this paper we introduce a large taxonomy of faults in deep learning (DL) systems. We have manually analysed 1059 artefacts gathered from GitHub commits and issues of projects that use the most popular DL frameworks (TensorFlow, Keras and PyTorch) and from related Stack Overflow posts. Structured interviews with 20 researchers and practitioners describing the problems they have encountered in their experience have enriched our taxonomy with a variety of additional faults that did not emerge from the other two sources. Our final taxonomy was validated with a survey involving an additional set of 21 developers, confirming that almost all fault categories (13/15) were experienced by at least 50% of the survey participants.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Software

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Peter Kairouz
  2. Paul Ralph
  3. H. Brendan McMahan
  4. Sebastian Baltes
  5. Daniel Ramage
  6. Elad Hazan
  7. Francesco Orabona
  8. Satyen Kale

In Information Systems

  1. Rajiv Mathews
  2. Sebastian Baltes
  3. Paul Ralph
  4. H. Brendan McMahan
  5. Daniel Ramage
  6. Peter Kairouz
  7. Franccoise Beaufays
  8. Ananda Theertha Suresh

In Software

  1. Peter Kairouz

Citations in the corpus