Processes of Interactive Spoken Discourse: The Role of the Partner

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production (2005, background): “…their utterances by virtue of what they believe is mutually known has been controversial in psycholinguistic theorizing (P. M. Brown & Dell, 1987; Horton & Gerrig, 2002; Horton & Keysar, 1996; Keysar & Horton, 1998; Lockridge & Brennan, 2002; Polichak & Gerrig, 1998; Schober & Brennan, 2003).”
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue (2004, background): “…of common ground in comprehension under circumstances in which speaker/listener perspectives are radically different (see also Brennan & Clark 1996; Schober & Brennan 2003), though they proposed that this occurs at a later monitoring stage, in a process that they called perspective adjustment.”
Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes (2008, background): “Brown and Dell (1987; see also Schober & Brennan, 2003) distinguish between specific and generic addressees.”
Listening and Human Communication in the 21st Century (2011, background): “Specifically in interpersonal exchanges, the way that the partner is perceived, and the hypotheses which the listener forms about the speaker have an effect on the way the message is understood (Habermann, 1996; Schober and Brennan, 2003).”
Lingua receptiva (LaRa) – remarks on the quintessence of receptive multilingualism (2012, background): “ten Thije (2003b) distinguishes seven features for the emergence of discursive interculture(s).”