Timing and Commitment of Environmental Policy, Adoption of New Technology, and Repercussions on R&D

By Till Requate. 2005

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac911aa280eda5b590ffa123a63724353beeee0c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change (2009, background): “Noting that the stringency of an optimal policy may change after new abatement technologies become available, Requate (2005) asks when policy adjustments should be made.”
Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation (2016, unknown): “Requate (2005) and Requate and Unold (2003) also treat the problem deterministically in a competitive setting where each ﬁrm selects a single technology.”
Does more stringent environmental regulation induce or reduce technology adoption? When the rate of technology adoption is inverted u-shaped (2012, background): “…diffusion presumably lowers the aggregate marginal abatement cost function” (p. 54), and this assumption is also made by Milliman and Prince (1989), Jung et al. (1996), Goulder and Schneider (1999), Fischer et al. (2003), Requate and Unold (2001, 2003), Rosendahl (2004), Requate (2005b) and others.”
The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation (2010, background): “…regulation after adoption of new technology; (ii) interim regulation after observing R&D success but before adoption; (iii) ex ante regulation with different tax rates contingent on R&D success; and (iv) ex ante regulation with a single tax rate, whether or not R&D is successful (Requate, 2005).”
Environmental innovation and environmental performance (2010, background): “…policy instruments and innovation incentives on a theoretical level, comparing emission taxes, marketable permits, technology mandates and performance standards, with and without technology spillovers and patent protections (see Requate, 2005a; Montero, 2002; Biglaiser and Horowitz, 1995).”
Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector (2015, background): “Different studies have highlighted the difficulties in ranking price-based and quantity-based instruments with regard to their effectiveness in spurring eco-innovation (Fischer et al., 2003; Kemp and Pontoglio, 2011; Requate, 2005; Veugelers, 2012).”
Environmental Policy Under Imperfect Competition (2006, methodology): “Montero [2002a, 2002b], Fisher et al. [2003], and Requate [2005] ), and several other issues.”
A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature (2018, background): “Scholars have applied integral conceptualizations to study the effect of governmental policies on adoption by focusing on the nexus between technology and environmental policies [179-182] and on the nexus between incentive- and prescriptiveoriented policy instruments [183, 184].”