Measuring the Gains from Trade Under Monopolistic Competition

By Robert C. Feenstra. 2010

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac81238a31125679acf6b36c0f16ab60a276e828

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Structural Estimation and Solution of International Trade Models with Heterogeneous Firms (2011, background): “…shows that variety gains can be measured by deviations in the ratio (Λ rt/Λ rt−1)−1/(σ−1) from unity, where Λ rz represents region-r's share of expenditures at equilibrium z on goods available in both equilibria to the total expenditures at z (see Feenstra (2010) for details on the calculation).”
Restoring the Product Variety and Pro-Competitive Gains from Trade with Heterogeneous Firms and Bounded Productivity (2014, background): “Financial support from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.”
New Trade Models, New Welfare Implications (2015, methodology): “In the new open economy equilibrium after the change in trade costs, (16) implies that welfare in the heterogeneous firm model is: ( W2 Het )σ−1 = L ( σ−1 σ )σ−1 [( φ̃2 d )σ−1 + χ2τ 1−σ 2 ( φ̃T2 x )σ−1]”
The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue (2011, unknown): “The export quality index is computed according to the Hausmann et al. (2007)’s approach and the variety indicator according to Feenstra and Kee (2008) and Feenstra (2010).”
A Global View of Productivity Growth in China (2016, background): “These ndings are related to the recent results by Arkolakis et al (2008, 2010), Feenstra (2009), and Atkeson and Burstein (2009) that changes in trade barriers often have similar aggregate e¤ects in models with and without rm heterogeneity.”