Restoring the Product Variety and Pro-Competitive Gains from Trade with Heterogeneous Firms and Bounded Productivity

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Welfare and Trade without Pareto (2014, background): “The more recent, Feenstra (2013), shows how double truncated Pareto changes the analysis of pro-competitive effects of trade. plete distribution of firm sales rather than just approximating the right tail, and (c) can be generated under equally plausible processes (see online appendix).”
International Shocks, Variable Markups, and Domestic Prices (2019, result): “Lastly, our theoretical result on (the lack of) the aggregate markup adjustment is related to the recent papers by Arkolakis, Costinot, Donaldson, and Rodríguez-Clare (2017; henceforth ACDR) and Feenstra (2018). In contrast with these papers, however, our focus is on the medium-run industry equilibr”
The Elusive Pro-Competitive Effects of Trade (2018, background): “manufacturing firms, though we note that the positive correlation between TFPR and TFPQ in Foster et al. (2008)—obtained for a small number of industries with information on physical productivity—also points towards r̂ > 0, which, through the lens of our theoretical analysis, again implies weakly lo”
From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and heterogeneity in the trade elasticity ☆ (2017, unknown): “Head et al. (2014), Yang (2014), Melitz and Redding (2013) and Feenstra (2013) have recently argued that the simple gains from trade formula proposed by Arkolakis et al.”