A simple three-dimensional macroscopic root water uptake model based on the hydraulic architecture approach

By V. Couvreur, J. Vanderborght, Mathieu Javaux. 2012

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many hydrological models including root water uptake (RWU) do not consider the dimension of root system hydraulic architecture (HA) because explicitly solving water flow in such a complex system is too time consuming. However, they might lack process understanding when basing RWU and plant water stress predictions on functions of variables such as the root length density distribution. On the basis of analytical solutions of water flow in a simple HA, we developed an “implicit” model of the root system HA for simulation of RWU distribution (sink term of Richards’ equation) and plant water stress in three-dimensional soil water flow models. The new model has three macroscopic parameters defined at the soil element scale, or at the plant scale, rather than for each segment of the root system architecture: the standard sink fraction distribution SSF, the root system equivalent conductanceKrs and the compensatory RWUconductance Kcomp. It clearly decouples the process of water stress from compensatory RWU, and its structure is appropriate for hydraulic lift simulation. As compared to a model explicitly solving water flow in a realistic maize root system HA, the implicit model showed to be accurate for predicting RWU distribution and plant collar water potential, with one single set of parameters, in dissimilar water dynamics scenarios. For these scenarios, the computing time of the implicit model was a factor 28 to 214 shorter than that of the explicit one.We also provide a new expression for the effective soil water potential sensed by plants in soils with a heterogeneous water potential distribution, which emerged from the implicit model equations. With the proposed implicit model of the root system HA, new concepts are brought which open avenues towards simple and mechanistic RWU models and water stress functions operational for field scale water dynamics simulation.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac6bba2ca44bd7f91c3aab7a1768cfa85b179ee8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Jasper A. Vrugt
  2. Alex B. McBratney
  3. Budiman Minasny
  4. Jirka Šimůnek
  5. Thomas Wöhling
  6. Yakov A. Pachepsky
  7. Bruno Cheviron
  8. Jean-Claude Mailhol

In Plant Science

  1. Bruno Cheviron
  2. Jean-Claude Mailhol
  3. Rami Albasha
  4. Daniel Leitner
  5. Tiina Roose
  6. S. Allison
  7. Dani Or
  8. Iain M. Young

In Soil Science

  1. Alex B. McBratney
  2. Budiman Minasny
  3. Jasper A. Vrugt
  4. Bruno Cheviron
  5. Jean-Claude Mailhol
  6. Rami Albasha
  7. Jirka Šimůnek
  8. Tiina Roose

Citations in the corpus