Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I: The Hodge Decomposition

By Claire Voisin, Leila Schneps. 2002

833 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

ON THE DYNAMICAL DEGREES OF MEROMORPHIC MAPS PRESERVING A FIBRATION (2011, methodology): “We refer the reader to the books by Demailly [6] and Voisin [23] for the basic facts on currents and on Kähler geometry.”
Hyperelliptic and trigonal Fano threefolds (2004, neutral): “In the case when the divisor g−1(∆) is ample on Ũ , Lefschetz’ theorem (see [55], [50], [121]) implies that Pic( Ỹ ) ∼= Pic( Ũ) ∼= Z(3) (see [60], [65], [66]).”
Characteristic classes of mixed Hodge modules (2009, methodology): “As references for mixed Hodge theory one can use [38; 52], as well as the nice paper [37] for explaining the motivic viewpoint to mixed Hodge theory.”
Comparison of dynamical degrees for semi-conjugate meromorphic maps (2009, background): “The reader will find in Demailly [4] and Voisin [19] the basic facts on currents and on Kähler geometry.”