ON THE DYNAMICAL DEGREES OF MEROMORPHIC MAPS PRESERVING A FIBRATION
By T. Dinh, Viet Anh Nguyen, Tuyen T. T. Truong. 2011
55 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Let f be a dominant meromorphic self-map on a compact Kahler manifold X which preserves a meromorphic fibration π : X → Y of X over a compact Kahler manifold Y. We compute the dynamical degrees of f in terms of its dynamical degrees relative to the fibration and the dynamical degrees of the map g : Y → Y induced by f. We derive from this result new properties of some fibrations intrinsically associated to X when this manifold admits an interesting dynamical system.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b39a7859ac33cf241e1b39509384f10524beee17
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Geometry and Topology
- Nguyen-Bac Dang
- Tuyen T. T. Truong
- N. Sibony
- T. Dinh
- De-Qi Zhang
- Franccois Berteloot
- Romain Dujardin
- Vincent Guedj
In Mathematical Physics
- Nguyen-Bac Dang
- T. Dinh
- N. Sibony
- Tuyen T. T. Truong
- De-Qi Zhang
- Franccois Berteloot
- Romain Dujardin
- Vincent Guedj
Citations in the corpus
- Equidistribution problems of complex dynamics in higher dimension (2016, background): “Specific needs can be obtained by going through the details of the proof of the above theorem, see [13, 22, 26].”
- Degrees of iterates of rational maps on normal projective varieties (2017, methodology): “Moreover, following closely the method of [31], one can also obtain another proof of the product formula due to Dinh–Nguyen–Truong [9].”
- Relative dynamical degrees of correspondences over a field of arbitrary characteristic (2016, methodology): “3 in [9] (see also [10]) was proven, in the case f is a dominant rational map, by using the following (which is in lines 2-3 in the proof of that lemma): (fn)∗(π∗(ω Y )∧ω q X) ≤ (fn)∗(π∗(ω Y )) o ∧ (fn)∗(ω X).”