Will you or can't you? Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests

By Trine Heinemann. 2006

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abe192bf9f18e5fc9bf594bf8e1a3579f25c90bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In General Health Professions

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Introduction: questioning and affiliation/ disaffiliation in interaction (2008, background): “…complaints (Drew and Curl, forthcoming; Lindström and Bergeå, 2007), offers (Curl, 2006; Heinemann, 2005), requests (Asmuss, 2007; Curl and Drew, forthcoming; Heinemann, 2006; Larsen, 2006; Lindström, 2005; Lindström and Ridell, 2005), and – as witnessed by this issue – questions and questioning.”
Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide (2012, background): “…past decades, conversation analysts have examined many acts with which people can “get others to do things” (Searle, 1976)—requests (Drew & Curl, 2008; Heinemann, 2006; Lindström, 2005; Wootton, 2005), orders (Goodwin, 1980; West, 1990), proposals (Houtkoop, 1987), advice giving (Guthrie, 1997;…”
Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments (2012, background): “…to the request, systematised by Curl and Drew (2008), are the degree of entitlement that the requester claims for themselves (a factor prefigured in Heinemann, 2006), and the degree to which the requester seems to appreciate the difficulties, or other contingencies, that might hinder the recipient…”
Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations (2014, background): “And, of course, besides the rights to determine what is going to happen instantly in the interaction, people also orient to their respective rights to make overt requests for specific future actions (Heinemann 2006; Curl &Drew 2008) or decicions about them (Stevanovic & Peräkylä 2012).”
Politeness and language (2015, background): “…related politeness issues (preference structures, entitlement, ‘ownership’ of knowledge, ‘fairness’) appears in the field of Conversation Analysis, for example, in Pomerantz and Heritage (2013), Lerner (1996), Heinemann (2006), Curl and Drew (2008), Heritage and Raymond (2005), and Heritage (2013).”
Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives (2012, background): “Previous research has demonstrated two highly significant dimensions to directing: entitlement and contingency (Antaki and Kent, 2012; Craven and Potter, 2010; Curl and Drew, 2008; Heinemann, 2006).”
Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting (2008, background): “Our findings concerning the association between request forms and speakers’ orientations to contingency are congruent with the findings of Lindström (2005) and Heinemann (2006) and of Vinkhuyzen and Szymanski (2005).”
Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian (2012, background): “…have been investigated on the basis of recordings of naturally occurring interactions (Craven & Potter, 2010; Galeano & Fasulo, 2009; Goodwin, 1990; Heinemann, 2006; Lindström, 2005; Raymond, 2011; Schegloff, 1979; Taleghani-Nikazm, 2006; Vinkhuyzen & Szymanski, 2005; Wingard, 2006; Zinken &…”