Introduction: questioning and affiliation/ disaffiliation in interaction
By Jakob Steensig, Paul Drew. 2008
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4aaf9698133c0ae51d9471848c7321957c0846a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence (2018, background): “In the following turn, after beginning with “that’s exactly what I want to point out” (line 7), which displays affiliation (Steensig & Drew, 2008) with D’s viewpoint, R reiterates D’s idea by furnishing a recipient formulation “young people always … whereas adults always want something simple”…”
- Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction (2009, background): “…invitations, requests, corrections, complaints, and challenges (Koshik, 2002; Monzoni, 2008; Pomerantz, 1988); do affiliation and disaffiliation (Steensig and Drew, 2008; Steensig and Larson, 2008); express entitlement, hostility, or deference (Grisci and Portecorvo, 2004; Heinemann, 2008;…”
- Establishing joint decisions in a dyad (2012, background): “Even if questions can sometimes be understood as attempts to challenge the co-participant’s views (Koshik, 2003; Steensig and Drew, 2008), this is not necessarily the case here.”