Beyond Kyoto: Climate Change Policy in Multilevel Governance Systems

By B. Rabe. 2007

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding Local Adoption and Implementation of Climate Change Mitigation Policy (2011, background): “Moreover, in the United States, limited federal support for climate change policy presents additional hurdles for subnational governments (Rabe 2004, 2007).”
Public Attitudes toward Climate Science and Climate Policy in Federal Systems: Canada and the United States Compared† (2012, background): “Given the vast array of institutional and cultural affinities and differences between the two federations, comparing Canada and the United States has a rich history in political science (Lipset, 1990; Simeon & Radin, 2010), as is increasingly evident in the area of comparative climate policy researc”
Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol (2009, background): “Although the U.S. Congress has yet to pass meaningful climate legislation, 17 U.S. states have developed their own CO2 emissions reduction plans, most noticeably in California (Rabe, 2007).”
Drivers of national climate policy (2013, background): “Although subnational policy in such federal systems has outpaced action at the central government level (Burke & Ferguson, 2010; Rabe, 2007), data on subfederal initiatives are less readily available for all states.”
Towards a New Political Economy of Climate Change and Development (2011, background): “As a result, there are multiple scales, high diversity and complexity in its governance, its finance, and its actors (Rabe 2007).”