Breeding habitat selection in cliff swallows: the effect of conspecific reproductive success on colony choice

By C. Brown, M. Brown, Etienne G. J. Danchin. 2000

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab4fb263c7c9990175a068607d102a8b16af8216

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs. conspecific cues (2001, background): “There is also evidence for colony quality assessment by prospecting in the great cormorant [Phalacrocorax carbo ( L.) ] (Schørring et al. 1999), and the cliff swallow [Hirundo pyrrhonota ( Vieillot) ] (Brown et al. 2000).”
Group size and ectoparasitism affect daily survival probability in a colonial bird (2004, background): “A number of separate costs and benefits of coloniality have been identified in cliff swallows (e.g., Brown and Brown 1996; Brown et al. 2001), and other work has focused on how these birds choose colonies (Brown and Brown 2000; Brown et al. 2000, 2002 ), but to date little has been known about with”
Can non-breeding be a cost of breeding dispersal? (2001, result): “This hypothesis is supported by correlative and experimental evidence from various species, as well as by theoretical considerations (Shields et al. 1988; Boulinier et al. 1996; Boulinier and Danchin 1997; Danchin et al. 1998b; Boulinier et al. 1999; Doligez et al. 1999; Brown et al. 2000; reviewe”
The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? (2005, background): “Thus, as in Brown et al. (2000), we ranked the PRS and population-trend effects within years.”
Prospecting in the collared flycatcher: gathering public information for future breeding habitat selection? (2004, background): “Information derived from the reproductive performance of conspecifics in a patch, that is, ‘public information’ (Valone & Giraldeau 1993), is thought to provide highly reliable cues about local patch quality for breeding habitat choice in the following year(s) (Danchin et al. 1998, 2001; Brown et a”
Effects of anthropogenic food resources on yellow-legged gull colony size on Mediterranean islands (2007, background): “Breeding site selection by colonial seabirds is generally the consequence of the previous year’s breeding success (Danchin et al. 1998), or linked with the presence of conspecifics (Oro and Pradel 2000; Oro and Ruxton 2001), or both ( Brown et al. 1990, 2000 ).”
Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “The breeding success of territories tends to be strongly autocorrelated from year to year, less strongly autocorrelated across 2 years, and weakly or not correlated across three or more years (Danchin et al. 1998; Brown et al. 2000; Piper et al. 2006).”
DISPERSAL AND SOCIAL ATTRACTION AFFECT COLONY SELECTION AND DYNAMICS OF LESSER KESTRELS (2004, background): “On the other hand, a fundamental assumption for the use of public information is that patch quality must be autocorrelated between years (Danchin et al. 1998, Brown et al. 2000).”