Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice

By Michael Mintrom. 2000

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab1dac85dca8775f577ce02010105cb528628f8d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Kay
2. Robert Ackrill
3. Susanna Loeb
4. S. Brouwer
5. Elinor Ostrom
6. Frank Biermann
7. M. Carnoy
8. Jaekyung Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Ambiguity and choice in European public policy (2008, background): “It involves activating particular dimensions of the problem to fit the solution in language that appeals to different policy-makers (Mintrom 2000: 137).”
• Towards Adaptive Management: Examining the Strategies of Policy Entrepreneurs in Dutch Water Management (2011, background): “For this reason, and in line with the research of Mintrom (1997, 2000) and Huitema and Meijerink (2010), policy entrepreneurs in Dutch water management frequently seek collaboration and link with individuals and groups in coalitions: “Even for our own water retention projects it is impossible to…”
• Polycentric Systems as One Approach for Solving Collective-Action Problems (2008, background): “…services to their own communities, sharing the burden for increasing benefits, the stimulus of innovation, the respect they receive from others, as well as the income they derive from their positions in public service for those who are not entirely volunteer workers (Mintrom 2000; Kuhnert 2001).”
• Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis (2002, methodology): “More recently, Michael Mintrom has modeled and tested the consideration and adoption of school choice legislation by states in the period 1987-1993 (Mintrom, 2000).”
• Multiple streams in EU policy-making: the case of the 2005 sugar reform (2011, background): “…key contribution to the literature on policy entrepreneurs, sees entrepreneurs operating outside decision-making circles.3 Moreover, he argues, ‘The policy entrepreneur must define problems in ways that are not readily dismissed by those who benefit from current policy settings’ (Mintrom 2000: 57).”