The empirical base of linguistics
By Carson T. Schütze. 2016
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab04cc82fb6029cc64037b8f01ee54c097d79f18
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- R. Dekeyser
- Frank Keller
- Mirella Lapata
- Stefan A. Frisch
- Bushra Zawaydeh
- Gisbert Fanselow
- Jon Sprouse
- Thomas Weskott
In Language and Linguistics
- Jon Sprouse
- Thomas Weskott
- R. Dekeyser
- Frank Keller
- Mirella Lapata
- Stefan A. Frisch
- Bushra Zawaydeh
- Gisbert Fanselow
Citations in the corpus
- Using the Web to Obtain Frequencies for Unseen Bigrams (2003, background): “In this way, each subject can establish their own rating scale, thus yielding maximally (cid:12)ne-graded data and avoiding the known problems with the conventional ordinal scales for linguistic data (Bard, Robertson, and Sorace, 1996; Cowart, 1997; Sch¨utze, 1996).”
- The Psychological Reality of OCP-Place in Arabic (2001, background): “Like any other linguistic behavior, well-formedness judgments are influenced by a variety of grammatical and nongrammatical factors (Schütze 1996).”
- THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (2000, background): “It is well known that grammaticality judgments do not constitute a perfectly valid measure of linguistic competence (for thorough discussions see, e.g., Cowart, 1997, and Schütze, 1996).”
- On the Informativity of Different Measures of Linguistic Acceptability (2011, background): “In the first part of that article, the authors followed up on the criticism brought forward by Schütze (1996) that the informal use of intuitive judgments poses a severe problem for the empirical assessment of theoretical claims in linguistics.”
- A Test of the Cognitive Assumptions of Magnitude Estimation: Commutativity does not Hold for Acceptability Judgments (2011, background): “…introduces at least two types of distortion into the ratings, and perhaps worse, the possibility of losing data (or statistical power) that might be significant for grammatical theories (these effects are sometimes known as SCALING EFFECTS; see also Bard et al. 1996, Schütze 1996, and Cowart 1997).”