Wise Reasoning in the Face of Everyday Life Challenges

By Igor Grossmann, Tanja M. Gerlach, Jaap J. A. Denissen. 2016

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people’s reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others’ perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbd82f2fdaf8318d4cbce6ac56760e862e5e0744

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Igor Grossmann
  2. Tenelle Porter
  3. Monika Ardelt
  4. Marc A. Fournier
  5. Karina Schumann
  6. T. Le
  7. A. Bergsma
  8. S. Etezadi

In Social Psychology

  1. Tenelle Porter
  2. Howard C. Nusbaum
  3. Monika Ardelt
  4. Marc A. Fournier
  5. Karina Schumann
  6. Igor Grossmann

Citations in the corpus