The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?

By M. Jae Moon. 2002

2,066 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Media Technology, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aabe03c945263d1f7560a1e8d2ad6225fa066826

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The Failure of E‐Government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review (2006, background): “This problem has been referred to by numerous academics (e.g. Heeks, 1999; Moon, 2002; Ho, 2002).”
Electronic Government at the Local Level (2003, background): “Another recent study (Moon, 2002) examined the same survey data presented in this article to assess the status of local e-government efforts, the perceived effective ness of those efforts, and whether institutional factors such as size and type of govern ment might explain differing rates of…”
E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model (2006, methodology): “For example, Moon relies on the maturity model proposed by PricewaterhouseCoopers.”
Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * (2005, methodology): “For example, many studies (Bugler & Bretschneider, 1993; Brudney & Selden, 1995; Norris & Kraemer, 1996; Norris & Demeter, 1999; Norris & Campillo, 2000; Moon, 2002; Norris & Moon, forthcoming) have found that government size is one of the primary factors related to IT adoption. Studying the effects”
A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector (2013, background): “) that the rhetoric of e Government has promised (Moon, 2002; Norris & Moon, 2005).”
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review (2018, neutral): “The terms electronic government ( e-government ) and smart government are still under development and have received great attention from researchers in diverse research and application ﬁelds in the last decade (Khan & Park, 2013; Layne & Lee, 2001; Moon, 2002; Meneklis & Douligeris, 2010).”
E-government adoption: architecture and barriers (2005, background): “Chen and Gant (2001), Heeks (1999), Ho (2002) and Moon (2002) identify the shortage of IT skills as another potential barrier that confronts some demanding challenges concerning government’s ability to provide the next generation of e-government services.”
The mechanisms of policy diffusion (2008, result): “Such findings would be consistent with Moon (2002), who uncovers positive effects of city size and council-manager governments in facilitating municipal website adoptions. Interestingly, Frederickson, Johnson, and Wood (2004) show how these city government types have emulated one another’s features,”
Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view (2015, background): “Electronic government (hereafter, eGov) is one of the most interesting concepts to have appeared in the area of public administration in the last few years (Moon 2002; Norris and Moon 2005) and has become a significantly prominent facet of governance (Morgeson et al.”
Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? (2005, background): “One important supply side analysis of municipal e-governments in the United States was done by Moon.13 This author concludes that major advances into the transaction phase of egovernment adoption were not evident in the survey results.”