The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size

By E. Baras, Christelle Malbrouck, M. Houbart, P. Kestemont, C. Mélard. 2000

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Surgical implantation of telemetry transmitters in fish: how much have we learned? (2002, unknown): “For example, PIT tagging experiments on juvenile Nile tilapia and perch indicated that the tag/body weight ratio affected growth (Baras et al., 1999, 2000).”
RELATING SIZE OF JUVENILES TO SURVIVAL WITHIN AND AMONG POPULATIONS OF CHINOOK SALMON (2004, background): “Several studies have demonstrated no adverse or size-related effects of PIT tags on fish in the size ranges we tagged (salmon [Prentice et al. 1990, Peterson et al. 1994], Eurasian perch [Baras et al. 2000]).”
Tag Retention and Survival of Age‐0 Atlantic Salmon following Surgical Implantation with Passive Integrated Transponder Tags (2002, background): “Baras et al. (2000) found that closing incisions with sutures resulted in 100% PIT tag retention among European perch (also known as Eurasian perch) Perca fluviatilis after 28 d, whereas only 80% of fish whose incisions were not closed with sutures retained their tags.”