DETERMINANTS OF PLANT EXTINCTION AND RARITY 145 YEARS AFTER EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT OF AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND

By R. Duncan, Jim Young. 2000

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa94d5a56443e0097372cb57195262385ec5b5d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Species evenness and productivity in experimental plant communities (2004, background): “…species of low relative abundance, both because such species appear to be inherently vulnerable (Fischer and Stöcklin 1997, Rooney and Dress 1997, Duncan and Young 2000, Gonzalez and Chaneton 2002) and because chance events are likely to have a larger impact on small populations (MacArthur and…”
Correlates of extinction proneness in tropical angiosperms (2008, methodology): “This lack of a relationship may result from the lag time between population reductions and extinction given that many of the taller species also have the highest longevity (Duncan & Young, 2000).”
A functional analysis of large‐scale temporal shifts from 1970 to 2000 in weed assemblages of sunflower crops in France (2009, background): “Plant size was relevant as taller plants have lower probabilities of extinction than shorter plants in open environments (Leach & Givnish 1996; Duncan & Young 2000).”
Documenting effects of urbanization on flora using herbarium records (2011, background): “…than the estimate of 1.7 and 2.0 for Middlesex and Cambridgeshire in England since 1750 (Preston 2000), 1.3 for species in a conservation area in metropolitan Boston from 1894 to 1993 (Drayton & Primack 1996) or 0.7 in the city of Auckland, New Zealand, from 1871 to 1985 (Duncan & Young 2000).”
Fifty years of change in northern upland forest understories: Identity and traits of “winner” and “loser” plant species (2006, background): “Leach and Givnish (1996) and Duncan and Young (2000) both found taller plants to have lower probabilities of extinction than shorter plants in open environments.”
Biotic Impoverishment and Homogenization in Unfragmented Forest Understory Communities (2004, background): “…reliable baseline data exist, temperate native plant diversity appears to be declining locally with accompanying increases in exotic species (Kwiatkowska 1994; Robinson et al. 1994; Drayton & Primack 1996; Leach & Givnish 1996; Fischer & Stöcklin 1997; Rooney & Dress 1997; Duncan & Young 2000).”
Lichen diversity and red-listed lichen species relationships with tree species and diameter in wooded meadows (2010, background): “Low abundance and small distribution range most probably makes these species more prone to extinction (Pimm et al. 1988; Manne and Pimm 2001; Duncan and Young 2000; Reynolds 2003; O’Grady et al. 2004).”
Species richness and evenness respond in a different manner to propagule density in developing prairie microcosm communities (2007, unknown): “Alternatively, if rare species are more likely to go locally extinct (Duncan and Young 2000; Gonzalez and Chaneton 2002; Wilsey and Polley 2004), then evenness of the remaining species would increase slightly in concert with each decrease in richness due to local extinction.”
Grassland diversity related to the Late Iron Age human population density (2007, background): “Although some studies demonstrate biodiversity loss due to increasing human population densities (Thompson & Jones 1999; Duncan & Young 2000), other authors have reported positive correlations between human population density and plant or animal diversity on large scales (Balmford et al .”