Boards of Directors, Market Discipline and Firm Performance
By Richard Bozec. 2005
218 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa3bac3fb05241434ef3beff79d74e4a2f447b23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- M. Pucheta‐Martínez
- Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez
- Paul M. Guest
- Collins G. Ntim
- Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández
- T. Soobaroyen
- Marcel Ausloos
- M. Kyere
Citations in the corpus
- Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective (2019, result): “According to the figures in Table 1, the countries most represented are the United States with 33.50% of the companies in the sample, Canada with 10.20%, United Kingdom with 10% and Japan with 9.8%.”
- Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Social Performance (2008, unknown): “10 The effectivity of the board of directors as control mechanism will depend negatively on the power of the manager (Lasfer, 2006) but positively on external control mechanisms like the product market competition (Bozec, 2005).”
- The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK (2009, background): “The advantage of larger board size is the greater collective information that the board subsequently possesses and hence larger boards will lead to higher performance (Dalton et al., 1999, 2005).”