LANDSCAPE-LEVEL PATTERNS OF AVIAN DIVERSITY IN THE OREGON COAST RANGE
By Samuel A. Cushman, K. McGarigal. 2003
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa3640a2c17f73da963f81a6edbf5eacf62c564b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- L. Fahrig
- Samuel A. Cushman
- K. McGarigal
- SJ Pittman
- Erin L. Landguth
- D. Thornton
- M. Sunquist
- L. Branch
In Ecology
- Samuel A. Cushman
- K. McGarigal
- L. Fahrig
- SJ Pittman
- Caitlin T McAlpine
- KM Pittman
- Erin L. Landguth
- V. Arroyo‐Rodríguez
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF FOREST BIRD SPECIES–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS IN THE OREGON COAST RANGE (2004, background): “…and configuration of mature forest for several species strongly associated with mature forest in the Oregon Coast Range, and the subsequent work by Cushman and McGarigal (2003) to quantify the relative importance of mature forest area and fragmentation and differences among watersheds in…”
- Linking fish and prawns to their environment: a hierarchical landscape approach (2004, background): “…multiple scales determine species distribution and abundance (Ricklefs 1987, Urban et al. 1987, Allen & Hoekstra 1992, Holling 1992, Schneider 2001, Cushman & McGarigal 2002, Lee et al. 2002, Grand & Cushman 2003) and that most species (and even different life stages) experience and respond to the…”
- The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure (2007, unknown): “Cushman & McGarigal (2003) demonstrated that early-successional species were lost when mature forest covered more than 80% of the landscape, whereas mature forest species were still present in landscapes where mature forest was rare or absent.”
- Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se (2017, background): “…and each landscape is 16× 16 m. Panel b from With et al. (2002); used with permission. et al. 2011) or purposefully in an attempt to minimize any correlation between habitat amount and fragmentation (e.g., Hovel & Lipcius 2001, Cushman & McGarigal 2003, Robertson et al. 2013, Plećaš et al. 2014).”