Marital satisfaction and spousal cost-infliction
By T. Shackelford, David M. Buss. 2000
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa30d08af066f396f3c5c743c4f2d26095927f0a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- T. Shackelford
- David M. Buss
- Aaron T. Goetz
- Harald A. Euler
- S. Hoier
- Pieternel Barelds-Dijkstra
- D. Barelds
- D. Schmitt
In Social Psychology
- Pieternel Barelds-Dijkstra
- Aaron T. Goetz
- Harald A. Euler
- S. Hoier
- T. Shackelford
- David M. Buss
- D. Barelds
In Sociology and Political Science
- David M. Buss
- T. Shackelford
- Aaron T. Goetz
- Harald A. Euler
- S. Hoier
- Pieternel Barelds-Dijkstra
- D. Barelds
- D. Schmitt
Citations in the corpus
- Relations between different types of jealousy and self and partner perceptions of relationship quality (2007, background): “Negative associations between jealousy and relationship quality have indeed been reported by, for instance, Andersen, Eloy, Guerrero, & Spitzberg (1995), Barnett et al. (1995), Buunk (1991) and Shackelford and Buss (2000).”
- Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition (2002, background): “Shackelford and Buss (Buss & Shackelford, 1997a, 1997b, 1997c; Shackelford & Buss, 1997a, 1997b, 2000 ), for example, documented that female infidelity is associated with her personality characteristics, her partner’s personality characteristics, and the discrepancy in mate value between her and he”
- Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory (2005, background): “Shackelford and Buss (2000) , for example, found that more frequent use of several mate retention tactics negatively correlates with spousal marital satisfaction.”
- When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men's mate retention (2005, methodology): “We argue for the continued use of Busss mate retention tactics and superordinate categories, which provides continuity with previous work (e.g., Buss, 1988; Buss & Shackelford; Goetz et al., 2005; Shackelford & Buss, 2000 ) and, in the present research, helps organize mate retention behaviors in a ”