Activation of Political Attitudes: A Psychophysiological Examination of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis

By James P. Morris, N. Squires, Charles Taber, Milton Lodge. 2003

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9f4f1868f3ac0ff96be51543b0a4494189fa788

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Silvia Galdi
2. C. Zogmaister

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Luciano Arcuri
2. Alessandro Amadori
3. Luigi Castelli
4. Silvia Galdi
5. C. Zogmaister

Citations in the corpus

• The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review (2009, background): “Morris, Squires, Taber & Lodge, 2003 ), the affective valuation of an unfolding statement becomes an integral part of computing its meaning.3”
• Predicting the Vote: Implicit Attitudes as Predictors of the Future Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters (2008, background): “Indeed, the evidence supporting the relevance of automatic evaluations for political choices is accumulating (e.g., Burdein et al., 2006; Lodge & Taber, 2005; McGraw, 2000; Morris et al., 2003; Redlawsk, 2004).”
• How to Evaluate It: The Role of Story‐Evaluative Tone in Agenda Setting and Priming (2007, background): “Actually, according to the ‘‘hot cognition’’ psychological hypothesis, all sociopolitical concepts a person has evaluated become affectively charged, positively or negatively, strongly or weakly ( Morris, Squires, Taber, & Lodge, 2003 ).”