Predicting the Vote: Implicit Attitudes as Predictors of the Future Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters

By Luciano Arcuri, Luigi Castelli, Silvia Galdi, C. Zogmaister, Alessandro Amadori. 2008

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f010f9c2c2152a2eab717140de45f23e5b20107f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Efrén O. Pérez
2. S. Feldman
3. L. Huddy
4. C. Mo
5. B. Albertson

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Efrén O. Pérez
2. S. Feldman
3. L. Huddy
4. C. Mo
5. B. Albertson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Efrén O. Pérez
2. Yotam Margalit
3. C. Mo
4. S. Feldman
5. L. Huddy
6. Neil Malhotra
7. B. Albertson
8. John T. Jost

Citations in the corpus

• On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice (2009, background): “Other researchers also find that implicit attitudes have relevant political effects (Arcuri et al. 2008, Burdein et al. 2006, Craemer 2008).”
• The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, unknown): “As Arcuri et al. (2008) point out, undecided voters comprise a sizable portion of the electorate and thus frequently play a decisive role in elections, but their behavior is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty; many of the ‘‘undecided’’ reach a decision only a few days before election…”
• Economic Explanations for Opposition to Immigration: Distinguishing between Prevalence and Conditional Impact (2013, background): “…be very useful in studying politically relevant attitudes that individuals will often want to misrepresent (Fazio and Olson 2003; Greenwald, McGhee, and Schwartz 1998) as well as in predicting political behavior (e.g., vote choice [Arcuri et al. 2008] and immigration policy judgments [Perez 2010]).”
• Religious Appeals and Implicit Attitudes (2011, background): “Implicit attitudes might ultimately affect political behavior, such as attending a political speech as shown in this paper, or even voting, as demonstrated by Arcuri et al. (2008). Implicit processes might often be completely consistent with explicit preferences, but a case of discordance might go u”
• Explicit Evidence on the Import of Implicit Attitudes: The IAT and Immigration Policy Judgments (2010, background): “The second perspective traces one’s opposition to immigration to authoritarianism, a more fundamental predisposition to be intolerant toward a variety of outgroups, not the least of which is immigrants ( Altemeyer 1996 ).”