An equivalence factor between CO2 avoidedemissions and sequestration – description andapplications in forestry
By Pedro Moura Costa, Charlie Wilson. 2000
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9f34d7b983dab723b4c0c074515d36b2d4a85c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions (2021, methodology): “…radiative forcing and the benefits of temporary carbon storage, e.g. the Moura-Costa method (Moura Costa and Wilson, 2000), the Lashof method (Fearnside et al., 2000), the Müller-Wenk and Brandão method (Müller-Wenk and Brandão, 2010), and the Clift and Brandão method (Clift and Brandao, 2008).”
- Carbon-Accounting Methods and Reforestation Incentives (2003, methodology): “Another accounting method discussed by Moura-Costa and Wilson (2000) consists of paying carbon credits in full when the project starts.”
- Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives (2003, background): “Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry, a special report prepared by the IPCC (IPCC, 2000), describes the tonnes-year approach for dealing with the lack of permanence of sequestered carbon (see alsoF arnside et al., 2000; Moura Costa and Wilson, 2000; Tipper and de Jong, 1998).”
- Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry (2000, background): “…as irreversible as fossil fuel combustion (Fearnside, 1999a. Mg-year accounting (Chomitz, 1998; Fearnside, 1995a, 1997a; Tipper and de Jong, 1998; Moura-Costa and Wilson, 2000) is useful for comparing avoided fossil fuel emissions with plantations and other mitigation options in the forest…”