Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

SAVING TROPICAL FORESTS AS A GLOBAL WARMING COUNTERMEASURE: AN ISSUE THAT DIVIDES THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT (2001, background): “While critics view liability issues under the CDM as “essentially insoluable” (Lanchbery, 2000), ton-year accounting offers a mechanism for rewarding carbon benefits as they are achieved, thus obviating the need for liability arrangements (Fearnside et al., 2000).”
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Hydroelectric Reservoir (Brazil’s Tucuruí Dam) and the Energy Policy Implications (2002, methodology): “Although no agreement on these issues has yet been reached, this author has advocated using a time horizon of 100 years in conjunction with discounting at an annual rate of about 1%, or its equivalent under an alternative time-preference weighting system (Fearnside, 2000a, b; Fearnside et al., 2000)”
Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives (2003, background): “2 Might conditions change such that emissions in the future cause more damage than the same quantity of emissions now? Temporal issues are discussed in the context of carbon sequestration by Fearnside et al. (2000) , Richards (1997) , Marland et al.”
Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications (2008, background): “Authors proposed the length of this equivalence period to be between 42 and 100 years (Fearnside et al. 2000; Moura Costa and Wilson 2000; Fearnside 2002).”