Source-sink population dynamics and the problem of siting marine reserves

By LB Crowder, S. Lyman, Will Figueira, Jeffery A. Priddy. 2000

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9dfd2920d89f990d6846880bfab85ff77ceed02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

PRINCIPLES FOR THE DESIGN OF MARINE RESERVES (2003, background): “…that the analysis qualitatively described here (Botsford et al. 2001) is not the same as arbitrarily setting aside a certain fraction of a species range as in Dahlgren and Sobel (2000), rather it involves calculating the fraction of lifetime reproduction needed for persistence (sustainability).”
AVOIDING CURRENT OVERSIGHTS IN MARINE RESERVE DESIGN (2003, background): “…at the downstream end, a reserve in mid-domain, and a set of three reserves of equivalent total size with one reserve each at upstream, downstream and mid-domain regions (see Crowder et al. 2000 for similar comparisons of reserve configuration but with simple stepping stone links between reserves.)”
Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. (2009, background): “…the concept of spatially complex linkages (or connections) among populations has been recognized in the value and design of MPA networks (e.g., Crowder et al. 2000, Botsford et al. 2001, Lipcius et al. 2001, Sala et al. 2002, Russ 2002, Hastings & Botsford 2003, Gaines et al. 2003, Halpern &…”
Marine reserves for Caribbean spiny lobster: empirical evaluation and theoretical metapopulation recruitment dynamics (2001, background): “Source-sink dynamics (Lipcius et al. 1997; Crowder et al. 2000) and variation in habitat quality were considered only qualitatively (see below).”
Larval dispersal reveals regional sources and sinks in the Great Barrier Reef (2006, background): “The impor- tance of source–sink structure on marine reserve management has been established by Crowder et al. (2000), although there are many other factors that must be considered in marine reserve design and management.”
MANGROVES AS ESSENTIAL NURSERY HABITAT FOR GOLIATH GROUPER (EPINEPHELUS ITAJARA) (2007, background): “This confirmation is critical from a conservation perspective because it provides a distinction between source and sink habitats; source habitats are currently the primary focus of efforts to protect fishery production (Crowder et al., 2000).”
Importance of Metapopulation Connectivity to Restocking and Restoration of Marine Species (2008, background): “Marine species are also likely to reside in “source” and “sink” habitats (Lipcius et al., 1997, 2001a, 2005; Fogarty, 1998; Crowder et al., 2000; Tuck and Possingham, 2000).”
Spawning Aggregation Sites of Snapper and Grouper Species (Lutjanidae and Serranidae) on the Insular Shelf of Cuba (2003, background): “Examinations of source-sink dynamics and marine protected area design have focused on both larval production (Roberts 1997) and habitatspecific demographic variables (Crowder et al. 2000).”
MARINE RESERVES EXPLOIT POPULATION STRUCTURE AND LIFE HISTORY IN POTENTIALLY IMPROVING FISHERIES YIELDS (2005, background): “This has been observed in both tropical and temperate fishes and invertebrates (Plan Development Team 1990, Polunin and Roberts 1993, Palsson 1998, Wallace 1998, Edgar and Barrett 1999, Paddack and Estes 2000, Halpern 2003).”
Trace elemental fingerprinting of gastropod statoliths to study larval dispersal trajectories (2003, background): “…consequences for not only understanding population dynamics and community structure (Caley et al. 1996), but also for the effective management of marine fisheries (Crowder et al. 2000, Warner et al. 2000, Castilla & Defeo 2001) and the design of marine protected areas (Gaines et al. in press).”
Effects of Noncompliance on the Success of Alternative Designs of Marine Protected‐Area Networks for Conservation and Fisheries Management (2004, background): “…assume complete displacement of fishing effort into open areas after implementation of the MPA (e.g., Polachek 1990; Demartini 1993; Guenette & Pitcher 1999; Sladek Nowlis & Roberts 1999; Crowder et al. 2000; Pezzey et al. 2000; Sanchirico & Wilen 2001; Gerber et al. 2002; Lockwood et al. 2002).”
The mangrove-based coastal and nearshore fisheries of Bangladesh: ecology, exploitation and management (2004, background): “Although such approaches can work in many instances, stock recovery is often perceived as too slow (Dayton et al., 2000; Ziemann, 2001; Molony et al., 2004) and changes in traditional management unpopular or unacceptable (Burton and Tegner, 2000; Crowder et al., 2000).”
Stock enhancement as a fisheries management tool (2003, background): “, 2000; Ziemann, 2001; Beattie, 2002) and changes in traditional management (e.g., no-take zones; Crowder et al., 2000) are unpopular or unacceptable (Burton and Tegner, 2000).”
Responsible genetic approach to stock restoration, sea ranching and stock enhancement of marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “In some cases, depressed stocks represent geographically marginal populations (Leggett and Frank 1997) or non self-sustaining sink populations (Crowder et al. 2000; Fogarty and Botsford 2007; Chen et al. 2014).”
Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts (2008, background): “Modelling studies confirm the intuitive idea that MPAs are most effective in productive areas (source populations), while locating MPAs in less productive populations maintained by the influx of immigrants (sink populations) may actually harm the overall yield (Crowder et al. 2000).”