Rating Banks: Risk and Uncertainty in an Opaque Industry
By Donald P. Morgan. 2002
1,156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9b0c61ef4bd02500ac9e4eaf32c9ad83bcc4e67
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Luc Laeven
- Ross Levine
- Thorsten Beck
- G. Caprio
- Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
- Kevin J. Stiroh
- Hamid Mehran
- Renée B. Adams
In Finance
- Luc Laeven
- Ross Levine
- Iftekhar Hasan
- F. González
- Thorsten Beck
- Hamid Mehran
- Renée B. Adams
- Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
Citations in the corpus
- Corporate governance and performance of financial institutions (2015, background): “…they may employ obscure and sophisticated financial instruments and engage in risky lending activities without appropriate risk assessment, resulting in greater information asymmetries and a more unstable financial system (Morgan, 2002; Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy, 2008).”
- Stress Testing Banks (2014, background): “Moreover, bank balance sheets are notoriously opaque and subject to easy-to-hide asset substitution (higher risk for lower risk assets); Morgan 2002.”
- Market Discipline of Banks: The Asset Test (2001, background): “Credit card lending became a very risky business over the sample period here, with a sharp rise in writeoffs from late 1994 to 1998 or beyond (Morgan and Toll, 1997 and Black and Morgan, 1999).”
- Corporate Governance and Performance in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Evidence from US Commercial Banks (2011, background): “be extremely complex and opaque which results in information asymmetries that intensify agency problems (Morgan, 2002).”
- Governance and Bank Valuation (2004, background): “Many argue that banks are extraordinarily complex and opaque (Morgan, 2002).”
- What matters in disclosures of key audit matters: Evidence from Europe (2018, neutral): “Morgan (2002) shows that banks receive more different bond ratings from different rating agencies than do nonbanks.”
- Earnings management behaviors under different monitoring mechanisms: The case of Islamic and conventional banks (2016, background): “, 2011), and greater information asymmetries between insiders (managers) and outsiders (stakeholders) (Morgan, 2002).”
- Corporate Governance in Institutions Offering Islamic Financial Services: Issues and Options (2006, neutral): “11 Caprio and Levine (2002), Morgan (2002).”
- Financial statement comparability and credit risk (2013, neutral): “…rated by at least two of the top three (the top two) rating agencies, percentages consistent with prior literature (Akins 2012; Cheng 2012; Livingston et al. 2007; Morgan 2002; Cantor and Packer 1997). rating_range denotes the absolute value of differences in ratings (in notches) between agencies.”
- Committee Independence and Financial Institution Performance During the 2007–08 Credit Crunch: Evidence from a Multi‐Country Study (2011, background): “For example, Pathan, Skully, and Wickramanayake (2008) find that improved financial institution governance is related to stock returns during a financial crisis.”
- Corporate Governance in Banking: The Role of the Board of Directors (2008, background): “Information asymmetries can be found in all sectors, yet the problems arising for financial intermediaries may be aggravated by the complexity of the bank business (Furfine, 2001; Levine, 2004; Morgan, 2002).”