Assessing Cloud-Phase Conditions

By S. Cober, George Isaac, A. Korolev, J. Strapp. 2001

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Importance of the mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: a multi-model study (2006, background): “Many flight studies have been conducted in order to estimate the temperature dependency for the partitioning of liquid and ice in clouds (e.g. Feigelson 1978; Bower et al. 1996; Cober et al. 2001), but widely different results have been obtained and no consensus has been reached to date.”
Microphysical characterization of mixed‐phase clouds (2003, methodology): “The threshold sensitivity for the RICE probe deduced from in situ measurements was estimated as 0.01 g m¡3 for a 30-second averaging time interval (Cober et al. 2001a).”
Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges (2017, methodology): “It should be noted that accretion of ice occurs on the surface of the icing rod only if the total air temperatureTtot is below the freezing point, and when LWC is lower than the Ludlam limit (Mazin et al. 2001; Cober et al. 2001a).”
Observed Microphysical Structure of Midlevel, Mixed-Phase Clouds (2002, background): “Cober et al. (2001b) encountered mixed-phase conditions in 26% and 46% of the clouds observed, respectively, in the First and Third Canadian Freezing Drizzle Experiments.”