Microphysical characterization of mixed‐phase clouds

By A. Korolev, George Isaac, S. Cober, J. Strapp, J. Hallett. 2003

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a75427323d81c0f80a6517cbeeb41515eef5d372

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. C. Hoose
2. Ulrike Lohmann
3. Hugh Morrison
4. Jiwen Fan
5. A. Korolev
6. P. Stier
7. Paul R. Field
8. A. Fridlind

In Earth-Surface Processes

1. Ulrike Lohmann
2. C. Hoose
3. Paul R. Field
4. A. Korolev
5. Jiwen Fan
6. Hugh Morrison
7. A. Ackerman
8. P. Stier

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Hoose
2. Ulrike Lohmann
3. Hugh Morrison
4. Paul R. Field
5. Jiwen Fan
6. A. Korolev
7. P. Stier
8. A. Fridlind

Citations in the corpus

• The effect of dynamics on mixed-phase clouds: Theoretical considerations (2008, background): “However, in situ observations have shown that mixed-phase clouds are a common phenomenon (e.g., Borovikov et al. 1963; Korolev et al. 2003; Verlinde et al. 2007).”
• Mesoscale modeling of springtime Arctic mixed-phase stratiform clouds using a new two-moment bulk microphysics scheme (2005, background): “…canonical structure of mixed-phase clouds has been observed in both polar (e.g., Hobbs and Rangno 1998; Pinto 1998; Rangno and Hobbs 2001; Lawson et al. 2001; Curry et al. 2000; Korolev et al. 2003; Z05) and midlatitude (e.g., Cunningham 1957; Hobbs and Rangno 1985; Rauber and Tokay 1991) regimes.”
• Intercomparison of cloud model simulations of Arctic mixed‐phase boundary layer clouds observed during SHEBA/FIRE‐ACE (2011, background): “…is the frequency and persistence of supercooled liquid water and mixed-phase clouds, even at temperatures substantially below freezing (Curry et al. 2000; Intrieri et al. 2002; Korolev et al. 2003; Shupe and Intrieri 2004; Verlinde et al. 2007; de Boer et al. 2011; McFarquhar et al. 2011).”
• Phase transformation of mixed‐phase clouds (2003, background): “The mean volume diameter of particles in glaciated clouds was found to be about 20 ¹m to 40 ¹m (Korolev et al. 2003) and their concentration about 2–5 cm¡3 (Gultepe et al. 2001; Korolev et al. 2003).”
• Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM (2007, methodology): “Probability distributions of mixed-phase cloud composition (IWC/TWC) for different temperature intervals from different model simulations as compared to observations from (Korolev et al., 2003). more likely at colder temperatures whereas at warmer temperatures clouds are mainly composed of water.”
• Microbiology and atmospheric processes: the role of biological particles in cloud physics (2007, unknown): “Analyses of ice number concentrations in a large number of stratiform and frontal clouds showed no relation between temperature and the concentrations of ice crystals down to sizes of 125 µm (e.g., Field et al., 2005; Gultepe et al., 2001; Korolev et al., 2003).”
• A global view of midlevel liquid‐layer topped stratiform cloud distribution and phase partition from CALIPSO and CloudSat measurements (2010, unknown): “The mixed-phase MLTSC fraction increased from 43.7% at CTT of (cid:2) 6 (cid:2) C to 95.2% at (cid:2) 30 (cid:2) C, which was consistent with the results of Korolev et al. ’s [2003] study.”