Climate change‐integrated conservation strategies

By L. Hannah, Guy F. Midgley, D. Millar. 2002

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b0b3abec6d03ce8af3bed3121149f4560614e20

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Potential impacts of climate change on the distributions and diversity patterns of European mammals (2007, result): “Our predictions, showing changes in ranges to be particularly significant in mountain ranges, are corroborated by other studies (Hannah et al. 2002; Thuiller et al. 2005a).”
Bioclimatic velocity: the pace of species exposure to climate change (2014, background): “Moving from physical climate space to a biotic climatic space could help guide the location and timing of conservation priorities and management actions for a given species (Hannah et al., 2002; Mawdsley et al., 2009) (Fig.”
Influence of bioclimatic variables on tree‐line conifer distribution in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: implications for species of conservation concern (2008, methodology): “By ‘training’ a model on current species distributions and bioclimatic parameters, and assuming a static relationship between climate and vegetation in the future, predictions of future changes in distributions under various climatic regimes can be developed ( Hannah et al., 2002 ).”
Latitudinal shift in thermal niche breadth results from thermal release during a climate‐mediated range expansion (2015, background): “Such investigations can inform conservation strategies (Hannah et al., 2002) and improve our understanding of how past environmental changes have shaped the current global distribution of biodiversity (Reusch & Wood, 2007).”
Satellite tracking large numbers of individuals to infer population level dispersal and core areas for the protection of an endangered species (2013, background): “…conservation planning, it is important to assimilate all available environmental criteria (e.g. Edwards & Richardson, 2004; Coll et al., 2010), including areas of seasonal use and how the distribution of sea turtle foraging sites might change over time (Hannah et al., 2002; Ara ujo et al., 2004).”
Modelling present and climate-shifted distribution of marine fishes and invertebrates. (2008, methodology): “Bioclimate envelope models are important tools to provide guidance for policy making (Hannah et al. 2002) although predictions from such models may be uncertain (Peason & Dawson 2003; Araújo et al. 2005; Araújo & New 2006; Lawler et al. 2006).”
Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions (2007, methodology): “Bioclimatic modelling is the most commonly used tool for assessing the potential impacts of climate change on species, and for policy making in relation to species conservation (Hannah et al., 2002; Harrison et al., 2003).”
Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios (2009, background): “Thus, projections from such models are valuable in generating hypotheses for future studies and providing guidance for policy making (Hannah et al. 2002; Peterson et al. 2002; Araújo et al. 2005).”
Impacts of global climate change on the floras of oceanic islands – Projections, implications and current knowledge (2015, background): “…modelling) as well as identification of emerging threats must be included in planning and area prioritisation for such reserve-based measures to adapt conservation strategies to the challenges and dynamic nature of climate change impacts (Hannah et al., 2002; Küffer et al., 2007; Heywood, 2011).”