Mental Workload and Situation Awareness
By P. Tsang, Michael A. Vidulich. 2006
278 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8fd139782e96ba7959a7c8081e76adbb798feb2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Sara E. McBride
- Peter A. Hancock
- Mark S. Young
- Karel A. Brookhuis
- Wendy A. Rogers
- Arthur D. Fisk
- C. Wickens
- Brian Scassellati
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- Challenges in Shared-Environment Human-Robot Collaboration (2013, background): “Collaborating with humans introduces a preference for representations that are inherently comprehensible to people, avoiding the introduction of any unnecessary cognitive load when properly implemented [16], [17].”
- State of science: mental workload in ergonomics (2015, background): “Mental workload (MWL) is one of the most widely invoked concepts in ergonomics research and practice (Flemisch and Onken 2002; Loft et al. 2007; Parasuraman and Hancock 2001; Tsang and Vidulich 2006; Wickens 2008).”
- Understanding human management of automation errors (2013, background): “Workload can be thought of as the supply and demand of attentional or processing resources (Tsang and Vidulich 2006).”
- Multiple Resources and Mental Workload (2008, background): “This distinction between regions is critical because most measures of workload are designed as much for the residual capacity region as for the overload region, if not more so (Gawron, 2008; Tsang & Vidulich, 2006).”
- The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload (2022, background): “…the workload involved in human-computer interaction brought forth a number of different evaluation approaches, including objective measures based on performance indicators and psychophysiological cues, as well as measures based on subjective experiences (e.g., Cain 2007; Tsang & Vidulich 2006).”
- Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction (2014, background): “These concepts are inherently intertwined (see, Tsang & Vidulich, 2006) and empirical evidence suggests that both influence human performance changes as a function of LOA.”