Critical examination of strain-rate sensitivity measurement by nanoindentation methods: Application to severely deformed niobium

By J. Alkorta, J. Martínez-Esnaola, J. G. Sevillano. 2008

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8e06169409c33ffb069cac89d20909d153a1643

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. Chengpeng Zhang
2. Ranjith Pathegama Gamage
3. Zhaoyang Ma
4. Mathias Göken
5. H. Höppel
6. A. Barnoush
7. M. Yaghoobi
8. George Z. Voyiadjis

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Chengpeng Zhang
2. Ranjith Pathegama Gamage
3. Zhaoyang Ma
4. Mathias Göken
5. K. Durst
6. H. Höppel
7. A. Barnoush
8. M. Yaghoobi

Citations in the corpus

• Nanoindentation strain-rate jump tests for determining the local strain-rate sensitivity in nanocrystalline Ni and ultrafine-grained Al (2011, methodology): “Alkorta et al.17 also used an indentation strain-rate jump technique to examine the SRS in UFG niobium.”
• Application of nanoindentation technology in rocks: a review (2020, methodology): “…and disadvantages of these methods, namely, constant load and hold test (CLH) (first proposed by Mayo et al. 1990), constant strain rate test (Lucas 1997; Lucas and Oliver 1999), strain rate jump test (Alkorta et al. 2008; Maier et al. 2011) and constant rate of loading test (Mayo and Nix 1988).”