Nanoindentation strain-rate jump tests for determining the local strain-rate sensitivity in nanocrystalline Ni and ultrafine-grained Al

By V. Maier, K. Durst, Johannes Mueller, B. Backes, H. Höppel, Mathias Göken. 2011

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dfd69a41aee86cf7f0033176bc757024e0c0dab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. Chengpeng Zhang
2. Ranjith Pathegama Gamage
3. Zhaoyang Ma

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Chengpeng Zhang
2. Ranjith Pathegama Gamage
3. Zhaoyang Ma

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Chengpeng Zhang
2. Ranjith Pathegama Gamage
3. Zhaoyang Ma

Citations in the corpus

• Application of nanoindentation technology in rocks: a review (2020, methodology): “…and disadvantages of these methods, namely, constant load and hold test (CLH) (first proposed by Mayo et al. 1990), constant strain rate test (Lucas 1997; Lucas and Oliver 1999), strain rate jump test (Alkorta et al. 2008; Maier et al. 2011) and constant rate of loading test (Mayo and Nix 1988).”