Computational Contact Mechanics

By Peter Wriggers, Giorgio Zavarise. 2002

2,302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8de2ea256defdf0834d1f7a0d6280fe7560ce26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

An unbiased computational contact formulation for 3D friction (2015, positive): “The friction algorithm is based on a predictor-corrector approach to enforce slip criterion (2), see [10].”
Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS (2012, background): “The order of integration is chosen to be sufficiently high in order to minimize the error in the evaluation of the integrals, following Fischer and Wriggers [13,14].”
Real-Time subspace integration for St. Venant-Kirchhoff deformable models (2005, methodology): “We use the implicit Newmark integrator (see [Wriggers 2002]), which is second-order accurate and commonly used in structural dynamics.”
A dual mortar approach for 3D finite deformation contact with consistent linearization (2010, background): “(10) We refer to [5, 6, 27] for details on constitutive laws for contact including friction.”
A contact algorithm for frictional crack propagation with the extended finite element method (2008, background): “A third class of approach, based on non-linear contact mechanics, applies to the case where the crack geometry is known a priori so that the element sides can be aligned to the crack [40–42].”
Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods (2004, background): “In the case of the classical Lagrangian formulation, much attention has been devoted to contact algorithms and the interested reader is referred to references by Zhong (1993), Wriggers (2002), Laursen (2002) in order to get acquainted with the subject.”
Stabilized low-order finite elements for frictional contact with the extended finite element method (2010, background): “There exists a large body of literature addressing the computational aspects of contact problems innonlinear solidmechanicsusing thefinite element (FE) method (see [25,48,51] and references therein).”
A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal–dual active set strategy (2009, neutral): “We refer to [1, 2, 30] for more details on contact constitutive laws.”
Polygon‐based contact resolution for superquadrics (2006, background): “The underlying problem is that in the context of commonly used node/segment contact models in finite element formulations, gap functions and normal directions in this case are not well defined [10, 11], and the direction of normal force may exhibit a discontinuous jump even though the contact pair i”
Simulation of tyre–pavement interaction for predicting contact stresses at static and various rolling conditions (2012, methodology): “However, for the tangential interaction between two contacting surfaces, the typical Coulomb friction law is used (Wriggers 2002 ).”