A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal–dual active set strategy
By Alexander Popp, Michael W. Gee, Wolfgang A. Wall. 2009
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/774f397af4a566f443745616fc0e63e78c051673
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Wolfgang A. Wall
- Alexander Popp
- Ilker Temizer
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- P. Farah
- Axel Gerstenberger
- U. Mayer
- Peter Wriggers
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Alexander Popp
- Wolfgang A. Wall
- Axel Gerstenberger
- U. Mayer
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Michael W. Gee
- Ilker Temizer
- M. Gitterle
In Mechanics of Materials
- Wolfgang A. Wall
- Alexander Popp
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Ilker Temizer
- U. Mayer
- Axel Gerstenberger
- P. Farah
- Peter Wriggers
Citations in the corpus
- 3D fluid–structure-contact interaction based on a combined XFEM FSI and dual mortar contact approach (2010, methodology): “An algebraic representation of the linear system (75)–(79) to be solved in each semi-smooth Newton step has been presented in [ 21 ,22].”
- Segment-based vs. element-based integration for mortar methods in computational contact mechanics (2015, background): “All details concerning these derivations have been presented in our previous contributions in [13,29,30].”
- A dual mortar approach for 3D finite deformation contact with consistent linearization (2010, methodology): “Numerical investigations for 2D contact in [17] though have shown very little influence on Newton convergence along a very broad spectrum of cn .”
- Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS (2012, background): “an exact evaluation of the surface integrals contributing to the weak formulation, combined with a discrete satisfaction of the continuous contact constraints through projected quantities [54,22,49,25,13,50,48,21,26,59].”