Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions--a three-dimensional panel analysis

By J. Berthelemy, Ariane Tichit. 2004

458 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8d99a837dbf9f0f6dd2f7ad87e7bb34fff5c7cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Christopher Kilby
2. R. Fleck
3. V. Thelen
4. J. Azam
5. F. Tarp
6. V. Outram
7. Stijn Claessens
8. Danny Cassimon

In Safety Research

1. R. Fleck
2. V. Thelen
3. F. Tarp
4. V. Outram
5. J. Azam
6. Stijn Claessens
7. Christopher Kilby
8. Danny Cassimon

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Christopher Kilby
2. R. Fleck
3. J. Azam
4. V. Thelen
5. V. Outram
6. F. Tarp
7. Stijn Claessens
8. Danny Cassimon

Citations in the corpus

• Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror (2010, background): “A number of papers examine how aid allocation changed with the end of the Cold War (e.g., Ball and Johnson 1996; Berthélemy and Tichit 2004; Boschini and Olofsgård 2007; Dunning 2004; Lai 2003; Meernik et al. 1998); some recent work explores changes since the start of War on Terror (Moss et al.…”
• Keeping a Low Profile: What Determines the Allocation of Aid by Non-Governmental Organizations? (2008, unknown): “Previous research has shown that some official donors tend to use aid to promote exports to recipient countries (e.g., Berthélemy and Tichit 2004; Nunnenkamp and Thiele 2006); others " buy " political support by granting ODA (e.g., Kuziemko and Werker 2006; Dreher, Nunnenkamp and Thiele 2008; Fleck…”
• Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria (2009, background): “Some recent studies on aid flows reveal (indirectly) that donors’ selectivity toward country need and policies has improved over time (Berthélemy and Tichit 2004; Roodman 2005; Dollar and Levin 2006; Sundberg and Gelb 2006).”
• Development Aid and Economic Growth: A Positive Long-Run Relation (2009, unknown): “5 This argument is supported by Berthélemy and Tichit (2004), who argue that the end of the Cold War brought about reduced bias in aid allocation on the basis of colonial ties in favor of a fresh bias in favor of trade partners. bias in a standard specification of the aid-growth relationship which…”
• The roles of foreign aid and education in the war on terror (2008, background): “By contrast, Berthélemy and Tichit (2004) find a significant positive impact of the Freedom House index of civil liberty and political right, in a panel data analysis covering the period 1980-1999, for 137 aid recipient countries, and 22 bilateral donors.”
• Need, Merit, or Self-Interest: What Determines the Allocation of Aid? (2011, background): “This estimation strategy is suggested by Berthelemy and Tichit (2004) and their main innovation is that they allow for recipient specific effects in equation (4): .”