Atom‐probe field‐ion microscopy

By H. Andrén. 2007

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8928dfca011df40e6f4679777e8160f7d3b4367

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Biomedical Engineering

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Mechanical Behavior and Strengthening Mechanisms in Ultrafine Grain Precipitation-Strengthened Aluminum Alloy (2014, methodology): “D reconstructions and data analyses of the APT data were performed using Cameca's IVAS Ò software, version 3.6.1.”
Local Electrode Atom Probe Tomography: A User's Guide (2013, unknown): “APT lift-out methods [36, 38–41] were adapted from transmission electron microscopy techniques [42].”
Atom Probe Tomography 2012 (2012, background): “APT is ideally suited to describe compositional fluctuations and to look for nonrandom statistical fluctuations such as those proposed (18).”
Estimation of the Reconstruction Parameters for Atom Probe Tomography (2008, methodology): “ful technique for physical metallurgy, enabling new insights into the mechanism of phase formations, precipitation, interface science or ultrafine scale materials characterisation (Hono et al., 1992, Miller et al. 1996; Edwards et al., 1998 Blavette et al., 1999; de ; Geuser et al., 2006; Moody et a”
Atom probe tomography spatial reconstruction: Status and directions (2013, background): “ 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. This intrinsic dichotomy between effects in the near and far field has long been D. J. Larson et al., Current Opinions in Solid State and Materials Science (2013) Submitted known [14]. These effects in the near and far field combine to create challenges for the accurate reconstr”
Dynamic strain aging studied at the atomic scale (2015, background): “The success rate of atom probe analyses of highly deformed samples is usually low due to the pulsed mechanical loading imposed during the measurements [43].”
Nanoscale austenite reversion through partitioning, segregation and kinetic freezing: Example of a d (2012, methodology): “This method allows us to measure the carbon content inside the austenite, which determines its stability, as well as inside the martensite and the carbides [17-28] .”
Chemical gradients across phase boundaries between martensite and austenite in steel studied by atom probe tomography and simulation (2014, background): “Atom probe tomography (APT) is a characterization technique that provides three-dimensional elemental mapping with nearly atomic resolution and gives information on the topology of interfaces and local chemical gradients [15-27].”
Atomic-scale analysis of carbon partitioning between martensite and austenite by atom probe tomograp (2014, methodology): “Carbon partitioning is investigated in detail by means of atom probe tomography (APT) [23–32] and correlative transmission electron microscopy (TEM), conducted directly on APT samples.”