Modeling attacks on physical unclonable functions

1,023 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A PUF taxonomy (2019, background): “It is apparent that a strong PUF would be inherently more versatile than a weak PUF; however, constructing a true strong PUF is very difficult or impossible since the device should not be vulnerable to modelling attacks [11].”
PUF Modeling Attacks on Simulated and Silicon Data (2013, methodology): “We used three hardware systems to carry out our experiments: A standalone, consumer INTEL Quadcore Q9300, and a comparable consumer AMD Quadcore, both worth less than 1,000 Euros.”
Physically Unclonable Functions (2012, background): “[123] show that with more advanced modeling techniques it is still possible to build an accurate”
Physically Unclonable Functions: A Study on the State of the Art and Future Research Directions (2010, background): “However, in [47] and especially in [ 44 ]i t was again shown that modelbuilding of these elaborate structures might be feasible.”
Physical Unclonable Functions and Applications: A Tutorial (2014, background): “However, the strong PUF does not require the use of additional crypto hardware to provide authentication services, and therefore must itself prevent unauthorized access into its own internal structure.”